1370 Ontario St. - Mezzanine, Cleveland, Ohio 44113 • (216) 241-2630 / Fax: (216) 241-6516

Membership
News and Issues
Departments
Secretary-
Treasurers
Information
Communications
FELA
Events
Links
User Info

Texas Supreme Court reverses $5 million verdict against Union Pacific

(The following story by Steve Korris appeared on the Southeast Texas Record website on October 29, 2009.)

AUSTIN, Texas — Reflective tape on a railroad crossing counts as a warning device, the Texas Supreme Court held when it wiped out a $5.1 million jury verdict against Union Pacific.

The justices ruled on Oct. 23 that Harris County District Judge Caroline Baker should not have taken the railroad to trial for the death of motorist Billy Limmer in 1994.

Federal law preempted his family's claim because federal funds paid for reflective tape on the crossing, the justices decided.

At trial the railroad chose not to argue preemption, preferring to let the judge resolve the question after the jury returned the verdict.

Baker denied preemption and entered judgment on the verdict.

Appeals judges in Houston rejected the preemption claim but discarded the verdict on other grounds and remanded the case for a new trial.

Neither side wanted that, so both sides appealed to the state Supreme Court. Widow Patricia Limmer sought to preserve the verdict and Union Pacific sought to erase it.

Limmer argued that reflective tape doesn't count as a warning device because it merely reflects light and doesn't tell motorists to stop, look or turn.

The justices disagreed.

"Markings are specifically mentioned in the federal regulations as traffic control devices," Justice Nathan Hecht wrote.

"More importantly, the use of retroreflective strips on crossbuck posts and blade backs is designed to reflect light back at motorists, to attract attention and provide an enhanced warning," he wrote.

The justices also absolved Union Pacific of failure to provide a clear view around a huge gravel pile near the crossing.

The accident happened in Thorndale, on Front Street.

Witnesses saw an eastbound train approaching at 40 to 50 miles per hour. They heard its horn and they saw a pickup drive slowly into its path.

Limmer died instantly.

His family sued, and jurors found Union Pacific negligent for failing to provide warning devices and failing to clear the view.

Jurors set damages at $6 million and held Union Pacific 85 percent liable.

Union Pacific then pleaded to Baker that federal railroad law preempted the claim because Union Pacific improved the crossing with federal funds.

The railroad had obtained reflective strips with federal funds and taped the strips to the crossing under a safety program the Texas legislature enacted in 1989.

Baker rejected the defense, without setting down any findings of fact.

Appeals judges agreed with Union Pacific and then disagreed, declaring the evidence on federal funding inconclusive.

They decided that Baker made an error in presenting the gravel pile as a separate jury question, and they sent the case back to her for a new trial.

Their decision sparked a double appeal that resulted in victory for Union Pacific.


"Retroreflective tape attached to a crossbuck is certainly a marking used to warn traffic of railroad crossings," Hecht wrote.

"The point of the 1989 program was that the addition of retroreflective tape to crossbucks would provide traffic with an additional, different warning of railroad crossings, making them more visible to motorists," he wrote.

He wrote that fatalities at railroad crossing dropped 56 percent from 1980 to 2004.

"Public policy does not require us to disturb a positive regulatory scheme," he wrote.

As for the gravel pile, Hecht wrote that a railroad has no duty to clear its right of way of things that might obstruct sight at a crossing.

He wrote that "a railroad's duty is to give adequate warning of approaching trains, given whatever obstructions or other conditions exist."

No one dissented.

Mike Hatchell represented Union Pacific. Deborah Hankinson, David Gunn, Carl Crow, Russell Post and Elana Einhorn represented Limmer.

Friday, October 30, 2009

© 1997-2009 Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen

 


Safety Task Force Hotline
800-306-5414

DAILY HEADLINES
November 20, 2009

AAR: U.S. rail freight volume down during Veterans Day holiday week
CN train crew now resting comfortably at home after hitting a rock/mud slide
TWU set to vote on SEPTA contract
Rail shippers, carriers see 2010 recovery
FRA study shows freight rail fuel efficiency up more than 20% since 1999
Buffett's Berkshire secures $8 billion loan for BNSF deal
Amtrak adding trains on Cascades route for Thanksgiving holiday
Montana sues BNSF over grain hauls
Opinion: New locomotives are green machines
Grand Central Terminal for Atlanta?
Report: 70 percent of Metra bridges need upgrades
Florida lawmakers confident about the passage of SunRail
CSX introduces ultra-low emission locomotives in Indiana
NS plan to run trains through park angers W.Va. officials
Amtrak extends fare promotion on Northeast Regional service
Rail grinding stirs some confusion
SEPTA moves ahead on extending R3 rail line
New York MTA sets final spending plan for 2010
UP derailment investigation continues in Ill.
Driver mistakes BNSF railroad tracks for road
Operation Lifesaver films distracted driving public service announcements
Midwest Association of Rail Shippers to host January meeting
Wisconsin land owner injured in ground collapse sues CSX
Union Pacific, San Antonio River Authority agree on new drift removal practices
CSX gives city $22,125 to plant trees along tracks
No Railroad Retirement benefit increase in 2010; Most retiree earnings limits remain at 2009 levels
Railroad Retirement annuities and pensions from work not covered by Social Security or Railroad Retirement
RRB: Medicare Part B Premiums for 2010
Final RRB Informational Conference of 2009 is Dec. 11

More Headlines


Enter your e-mail address to receive BLET news updates.

Subscribe  Unsubscribe